Wednesday, 22 July 2009

Oy, Anonymous, I Want A Word With You!


(Submitted by a Reader)

Whenever I am told anything by the government, my local council, my employer, my kid's school, the owner of my golf club, my neighbours etc., I do the same thing: I think about what they've said, I think about what they have said in the past, I think about the independent information I have and I make my judgement as to exactly what's happening. Why should I do anything else when it comes to my football team?


And it seems to me that that's what Hammersfan does. He looks at what's going on and comes up with an article that provokes thought and debate. Some are amusing, some tongue in cheek, some are hard hitting and some are just crap! But he does provide a site which comments daily on the club, where anyone can voice their opinion and even contribute a lead article if they wish, so why does he get so much flack? When Newsnow is clogged up with the same information expressed in 24 slightly different ways I find it stimulating to read an article that takes an alternative view.


In my experience it is the things that we cherish most dearly, that we question and challenge the most. I support West Ham the team, not the corporate entity and as far as I am concerned, challenging the motives of whoever is temporarily in charge of our club is a demonstration of love for West Ham, not an indication that he's a spurs fan. I confess to being an old cyber mate of Hammersfan and am amazed at the amount of childish vitriol and even threats of violence that he attracts. Perhaps those who are not impressed should ignore it so that those who do enjoy the articles could comment without having to wade through so many immature offerings.

63 comments:

  1. I don't always agree with what Hammersfan says but i will fight for his right to say them and then sit back and chuckle at how angry people get!

    ReplyDelete
  2. the freedom to slag this crap off is equal to the freedom to write it in the first place. If you don't like it then stop posting it with the facility to leave comments.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Why dont you just go down on him then!!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. and it's 'Oi' not 'Oy'. Oy is actually yiddish, which is mildly ironic.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Oy, Dickhead, I want a word with your wife.. in my bedroom. Tonight at 7pm. Let her know, she know's where it is.

    And by the way, I'm not the "Anonymous" your article is directed at, but a member of your Top 100 Hater's Club. Membership has been spiraling out of control lately, perhaps because you've been blogging more often.

    Sincerely,

    Your mother

    ReplyDelete
  6. an old cybermate eh? They never let you down.

    ReplyDelete
  7. oy gevolt!!
    Haha priceless

    ReplyDelete
  8. Fanno, whenever these mindless yobs get you down remember that our forefathers died to defend freedom of speech and to save us from being mindless drones (like the ones that hassle the freethinkers on this site). Keep up the good work :-)

    ReplyDelete
  9. "He looks at what's going on and comes up with an article that provokes thought and debate... so why does he get so much flack?"

    Because it is linked to News Now. Headlines about clubs come up and naturally attract interest from fans. Football is a polemic subject and supports are filled with passion about their clubs. To be pulled towards a blog that is constantly negative and critical of everything the club does is frankly tedious and at times embarrassing, especially when coupled with immature references to our own team and others.

    "I am concerned, challenging the motives of whoever is temporarily in charge of our club is a demonstration of love for West Ham"

    I fully agree but claiming we're in for relegation on the 17th July and turning the Brooking stand announcement into another dig just highlight why fans of the club get annoyed. No we shouldn't blindly follow but if steps are being taken to right the club internally given the fact we were candidate for administration a few months ago, I would at least give them the chance before condemning them, yes it's a lot of spin, but who is going to buy us off a bank if we said 'Yeah we're incompetant, financially shambolic and a bit shit'?

    "I confess to being an old cyber mate of Hammersfan and am amazed at the amount of childish vitriol and even threats of violence that he attracts."

    I can see why you would leap to his defense and that is just a sad fact of the internet and society though don't you think?

    "Perhaps those who are not impressed should ignore it so that those who do enjoy the articles could comment without having to wade through so many immature offerings."

    In fairness you open the floor to comments, you have to take the rough with the smooth, disable the comments and job done. On the flip side some people might be offended having to wade through what they might see as constant unsupporting, immature articles from said author - can't have it both ways, the man wants to put his view across, some want to refute it.
    Again, football is a polemic, passionate subject for many and HF has been brave enough to open his opinion up to comment.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I often read the articles posted by the HammersFan and I understand his frustration at some of the things that are posted on the net relating to our team etc etc. He is only expressing personal opinion and views and don't really deserve to be slagged off. I agree with others that sometimes the way some articles read they do come across as a dis to the club but I don't believe it is the intentions of HammersFan to deliberately upset every reader that reads his articles. Let us all try and participate with constructive comments going forward...

    P.S - this is the 1st time I've ever posted on this site however, I do often read articles on this site purely due to being a fellow Hammers supporter!

    COYI

    ReplyDelete
  11. Beggars, I accept all the points you make. I don't object to the comments at all. I think some are unnecessarily offensive and the "You can't be a hammer" stuff is frankly pathetic - I would have to be some boffin to know all I know about West Ham without being a fan. Look at the comment from 1321, how sad and pathetic is that? It will buy a cheap reply from me but, honestly, what does the guy think he is doing writing stuff like that? It is no skin off my nose but it does reflect the cancer in our society where abuse takes the place of debate and argument.

    Anyway, thanks for your contribution. You can write; fancy submitting an article?

    ReplyDelete
  12. 1250, you might be surprised to learn that I agree with you. That's why I allow through the criticism, providing obscenities are not used. (I haven't been able to post half a dozen replies where either the f or c word have been used or where sexual acts have been described graphically.)

    ReplyDelete
  13. 1321, the wife says that after last time she is not interested. Too small, too fast and very bad technique apparently. To the bedroom what Di Michele is to finishing!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Beggars

    Your response is valid, it's a constructive argument and by no means do I want to strangle debate and opinion. But there are far too many inane comments that are frankly pathetic. Nothing wrong with disagreeing with Hammersfan, I often do myself; the more interesting comments are usually from people who construct a cogent argument and make their point without being abusive.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I started reading this blog before relegation to the 'all sources' league and even though i've given it a few digs (no swearing mind) it'd be a shame if you didn't continue. You have an uncanny ability to give people the needle which can only be applauded. Having a pop at Big John while he's under the knife was beautiful and the way you pissed on the Brooking Stand chips, mesmeric. Hurrying Zola out the door back west was a nice touch, while the defence of John Terry over the mum-cussing fans was surely the cherry. I salute your hammer-baiting skills. Top man. COYS

    ReplyDelete
  16. supernumbersix22 July 2009 at 18:08

    If you care to look at WestHamFans.org and a thread entitled Irons Germany you may well discover some of the reasons he is so disliked by so many proper West Ham fans.

    ReplyDelete
  17. What Irons Germany, that guy who spouted support for the Final Solution on the Mordant Org despite working as a professional golfer in Germany? Yes, I can understand why decent people would dislike him and why thuggish and racist elements amongst the West Ham fan base would prefer his approach over mine. Friend Tony has gone a little quiet recently, since the implications became clear of spouting public support for Hitler and Nazis. Employers in Germany do not take kindly to that sort of thing. In fact, you can be arrested for it. Best not open that one up again eh? I'm not sure Tony would want you to given the vulnerable position he has put himself in! A poster by the name of Tom Hanks knows quite a bit about Irons and seems to have an axe to grind. I'd rather not be involved myself - I made clear my feelings about celebrating the murder of 6 million Jews at the time Tony posted his obscene comments.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Who is the lowlife slug, hiding behind the 'supernumbersix' moniker eh?? Can't think of anything more original to do with your single celled brain?
    Why don't you slither back into your hole and stop trying to drag others into your petty, rubbish squabbles from other sites that most of us have no interest in eh??
    6.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I have a fair idea who it is mate. Take it as a compliment! What's that about emulation? He is a complete arse if it is who I think it is!

    ReplyDelete
  20. anonymous 1704 - top post mate, top post - don't do as I do do as I say. HF's ego sat astride his white charger whilst cutting all & sundry to pieces as he sees fit is the problem. Hotshot C why does he have the right to slag who he like while I don't have the right to reply as I see fit, what's the difference? It's only cyber space so cares so?

    ReplyDelete
  21. 2010, you have the right to tear me to bits on here providing you do so without obscenities and without threatening violence. I am not accusing you of either, just confirming the boundaries. The question is, why are you so vitriolic given the right to reply. If I was posting my articles and then declining to post the responses, I could empathise with you, but that's not the case. I don't ban people or refuse to publish dissenting views on here; I leave that to the Mordant Org.

    ReplyDelete
  22. 'cancer in our society where abuse takes the place of debate and argument'

    who do you think you are, Charles Dickens?

    Have you ever considered the fact that your articles are so boringly negative that people actually hate you. I don't call that stupidity or childish, i call that passion and loyalty, something you lack obviously. We are a club with increasing ambition, yet you always always always find something unsupportive to say.

    I'm off to read the 'west ham till i die' articles.

    ReplyDelete
  23. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Markle, a polite response from an Orgster! Not many of those. I could demolish your argument with arguments of my own. I wont. I will trust to others. Fanno was voted "Best Debater" and "Most Entertaining" contributor when operating under his true name at the Org. That was the opinion of the other members. When Fanno was banned, 2/3rds of the cats whose owners expressed a preference called for him to be allowed to return. El Martillo was banned along with him without doing ANYTHING wrong other than disagreeing with the Klan.

    Fanno's name still features regularly. "He who shall not be named" features in Bill's call for head Klansman 'Irons Tony Swing A Club At A Jew's Head Germany' to return. That shows the obsession the Org has with Fanno, not vice versa. The campaign waged against this blog, meanwhile, has been vitriolic and persistent. So what? I post the criticism and let others make up their own minds. This isn't a forum, it is a blog, but I allow everybody to have a voice and right of reply, I ban nobody. Only vile obscenities, racism, pornography and outright threats of violence are not allowed through. For your information, I offered to carry a link to the org.

    What harm can Fanno be doing if contributing on the Org without anybody even knowing who he is exactly? Why the need to know he is gone? Why the paranoia exactly?

    ReplyDelete
  25. Oh well I did try but I didn't really expect anything else really. You have only proven to me what....

    What's the point?

    Mark

    ReplyDelete
  26. Markle, a polite response from an Orgster! Not many of those Two thirds of them loved you. I could demolish your argument with arguments of my own. I wont. and then you proceed to do just that I will trust to othersthe polite two thirds that love you Fanno was voted "Best Debater" and "Most Entertaining" contributor when operating under his true name at the Org.have you considered some were so frightened to be rip apart by you in public that they. That was the opinion of the other members. the polite two thirds that love you of course When Fanno was banned, 2/3rds of the cats whose owners expressed a preference called for him to be allowed to return. check your stats & whether there might be a slight chance you are exaggerating El Martillo was banned along with him without doing ANYTHING wrong other than disagreeing with the Klan.if he is someone other than you, of the I doubt, you are as much to blame as anyone else in getting him banned and that was Nev not the Klan Who are those guys?

    Fanno's name still features regularly. "He who shall not be named" features in Bill's call for head Klansman 'Irons Tony Swing A Club At A Jew's Head Germany' to return.it’s a fact you feature yourself regularly. What you chose not to see is you are named but that FACT does not suit your argument so you chose to ignore it as always That shows the obsession the Org has with Fanno, wrong again a web-site cannot be obsessed but an individual like yourself can be and paranoid too not vice versa. The campaign waged against this blog, meanwhile, has been vitriolic and persistent. So what?SNAP I post the criticism and let others make up their own minds.letting people make up their own minds is not part of your make-up This isn't a forum, it is a blog, but I allow everybody to have a voice and right of reply, I ban nobody. Only vile obscenities, racism, pornography and outright threats of violence are not allowed through. For your information, I offered to carry a link to the org.stop feeling sorry for yourself it’s not becoming

    What harm can Fanno be doing if contributing on the Org without anybody even knowingbut they do know, that’s the point who he is exactly? Why the need to know he is gone? Why the paranoia exactly?sit down & take a close honest look at yourself as an individual and not an inanimate web site ~~~~~~~ revealing isn’t it

    ReplyDelete
  27. Markle, why would people feel threatened into voting for Fanno? That is a silly argument. Why would people want him back if they were afraid of him? That is a self defeating strategy surely. Who are the Klan? Irons, Bill, del and davefking are at the core - try challenging their opinions over an extended period of time and see what happens! Then there is a group who are genuinely intimidated by this bunch so they fall in line behind them. I don't give a monkey's personally, I never did. I enjoyed the banter and the exchanges like this, but so what? How sad is somebody who gets wound up over exchanges on the internet? Keep in mind, that I could block your contributions here in the same way as Nev has blocked (or sought to block ; )) Fanno. El Martillo is not me and there is no way that I am to blame for his banning. Neville knows that we do not share the same ISP addresses - El Martillo was banned because he took the mickey out of the Klan - his very last post!

    ReplyDelete
  28. This is my last attempt this morning at two-way communication; my shift starts all too soon.
    You chose not to look at why people would fall in behind you over an extended period, it’s not a silly argument as you put it; it is very fundamental but hey let’s not let that get in the way of what you would have us believe eh? There were only a very few very very few people who could put up with you in the long term but that hurts (ego dented) and does not benefit your stance so you chose not to see it. From what I can see the people who you call the Klan are very much their own men and had a dis-similar view to yours and would not agree with you out of fear of public ridicule by you, that is the honest problem for you, isn’t it, you could not make yourself top dog so you sought to destroy some of WHF.org’s top posters? No, your denial will only prove me right. Oh by the way I have challenged their opinions, on numerous occasions without it degenerating into the kind of slanging matches you provoke & like so much, how come? “You don’t give a monkeys” not much you don’t who you trying to kid? You “enjoyed the banter” seems like you might be contradicting yourself now. But some people don’t like to go on for ever it’s boring. You get wound up over exchanges on the internet, so what? No, your denial will only prove me right. Neville bans who he likes that’s his prerogative that has nothing to do with any posters including your Klan; asking him to look in is all he needs to do…. “that we do not share the same ISP addresses” that is child’s play to get around, do you think I would be fooled by that one? Took the micky out of the Klan struth you can’t really believe that surely or worse expect me to believe it that’s laughable? Oh and you block away HF I really do not give a monkeys, all that will serve to do is make me right

    ReplyDelete
  29. It was Neville who said he could track ISPs addresses, not me. And he put a block on mine for a while proving he does check. He knows El Martillo is not me and all El Martillo did was write a tongue in cheek send up of key members of the Klan, and myself. Check the history!

    You say you can debate with me without it becoming a slanging match. Why do you think that is? Fanno always maintained that he responded in kind. Civility buys civility, an insult buys a suitable response. That's life surely? Do I insult many people on here? Have I insulted you during this discussion?

    ReplyDelete
  30. All very public display, deal with my issues as you would say

    ReplyDelete
  31. What issues? I have dealt with everything as far as I can see.

    Ask me to address numbered points and I will do so. Be clear, point by point, on what you want me to address.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Markle, I have contributed under this name for two years now and argued extensively with Fanno over his treatment of Curbishley whilst arguing with the establishment over their treatment of Fanno.

    I am in regular contact with one Orgster, however I will not name him out of respect. I would not wish him to be tagged with consorting with the anti-christ as he enjoys the site though I must say I don't know why now that all the free thinkers such as Saltbush Bill, Dutch, Denbigh, Winchester, Basildon etc. have chosen to stop posting. He is well aware that I am not Fanno.

    "Evil flourishes when good men do nothing" is how WHTID starts his eulogy to Irons Germany. Well I've just read through the infamous "my mate Adolf" post again and as I remember not too many "good men" did anything when that piece of filth was posted. I appreciate that in the heat of the moment we may all say things that we later regret, but no decent human being could come out with that vile diatribe. The fact that so few criticised the post speaks volumes for the attitudes and opinions of so many of the "good men" on that site.

    ReplyDelete
  33. "I don't know why now that all the free thinkers such as Saltbush Bill, Dutch, Denbigh, Winchester, Basildon etc. have chosen to stop posting" Saltbush Bill said that he did not really follow football and it clearly showed in the quality of his footie posts though he did have a good sense of humour. Dutch so far up his own arse and only turned up when West Ham had a poor result and most of what he said was pure rubbish. Denbigh and Winchester average posters at best. Basildon was always good to get everyone going but sadly never posted much and indeed questions have been raised to his true identity.The site has maybe lost some but these type of sites always do but while the likes of Del, Aycliffe, Pete, Ashes and many more carry on posting then it will carry on well even without the mighty one of many faces.

    ReplyDelete
  34. The point is, there was variety when all those named contributed. They did not all sing from the same hymn sheet and so sparks flew. Now the debate rarely stimulates and if anybody risks disagreeing with the Klan, they couch their comments in extreme sycophancy. It is stomach turning to read sometimes. And to participate...dear God Fanno has had to reach for the sick bucket a few times whilst "playing the game".

    ReplyDelete
  35. What you don't seem to get and never did you sad excuse for a human being is that it is quite obvious that on a West Ham site with West Ham posters people will generally get on. If it was a general forum then obviously more sparks would fly. The only time sparks fly on here is from opposing fans you wind up or some of your old friends. The org continues without you but you can't continue without it and it shows how sad you are with your numerous attempts to return. I pity you and I pity those close to you though I can't believe for one minute that would include many.

    ReplyDelete
  36. LOL If you want a sad excuse for a human being, check out the self pitying drivel written on the "Come back Irons" plea. Dear God, Fanno is turned into Machiavelli, Hitler, Saddam and Satan himself all rolled into one. I've never heard such whines from a grown man! Please sir he stole my ball! The excuse for Tony the German Golf Professional's Nazi rant is sublime - Fanno made him do it and he didn't mean any of it, Fanno had brainwashed him! Dear God, why not say Fanno had hypnotised him and he was "Only following orders" - that's the usual Nazi excuse isn't it?

    So a West Ham forum is supposed to be one big love in is it? What's the point then? Ashton? Brilliant bruv. Yeah brilliant bruv. Couldn't agree more bruv, brilliant. Green? England's number one bruv. Agree bruv. Spot on bruv. Yawn!!!!!

    As for getting by without Fanno, why does Fanno get so many mentions and who do you think keeps the threads bubbling along? Can you spot the Fanno this week? Nev should run a competition with Ten Klan Points for the Klosest! LOL

    ReplyDelete
  37. 女性会員様増加につき、当サイトの出張ホストが不足中です。女性の自宅やホテルに出向き、欲望を満たすお手伝いをしてくれる男性アルバイトをただいま募集していますので、興味のある方はTOPページから無料登録をお願いいたします

    ReplyDelete
  38. プロフ見た感想を携帯アドの方に送ってください。悪口は気が病むので止めておいて欲しいですjewely.jmtjd@docomo.ne.jp

    ReplyDelete
  39. ゲイの数が飛躍的に増えている現代、彼らの出逢いの場は雑誌やハッテン場からネットに移り変わってきています。当サイトは日本最大のゲイ男性の交流の場を目指して作られました。おかげさまで会員数も右肩上がりに伸びています。ゲイの方や興味のある方はぜひ当サイトをご覧ください。

    ReplyDelete
  40. 家出している女の子と遊んでみませんか?彼女たちはお金に困っているので、掲示板で知り合ったいろんな男の家を泊り歩いている子も多いのです。そんな子たちとの出逢いの場を提供しています

    ReplyDelete
  41. ストーカーの追い回されて怖いんです。毎日夜になると非通知電話多いし怖い。。。助けてくださいpeach-.-girl@docomo.ne.jp

    ReplyDelete
  42. 復活、スタービーチ!日本最大の友達探しサイトがついに復活、進化を遂げた新生スタービーチをやってみませんか?理想のパートナー探しの手助け、合コンパーティー等も随時開催しています。楽しかった頃のスタビを体験しよう

    ReplyDelete
  43. 「友達の中で処女なのは私だけ…でも恥ずかしくて処女だなんて言えない、誰でもイイからバージンを貰ってほしい!」そんな女性が沢山いる事をご存じですか?出合いが無かった、家が厳格だった等の理由でHを経験したことがない女性がたくさんいるのです。当サイトはそんな女性たちと男性を引き合わせるサイトです

    ReplyDelete
  44. メアド開運、あなたの使ってるメアドを診断出来ちゃうサイト!吉と出るか凶と出るかはあなた次第、普段使ってるメアドの金運、恋愛運が測定できちゃいます

    ReplyDelete
  45. 今話題の逆¥交際!あなたはもう体験しましたか?当サイトでは逆援希望の女性が男性を自由に選べるシステムを採用しています。成功を収めた女性ほど金銭面は豊かですが愛に飢えているのです。いますぐTOPページからどうぞ

    ReplyDelete
  46. 只今、シャープ32型液晶テレビ、PS3等、豪華商品が当たるキャンペーンを実施中!まずは欲しい商品を選び、メールアドレスを登録して無料エントリー!その場で当たりが出たら賞品ゲットできます。抽選に外れた方もWチャンスで商品券等が当たります。ぜひチャレンジして下さい

    ReplyDelete
  47. 一夜限りの割り切ったお付き合いで副収入が得られる交際サイトのご案内です。アルバイト感覚での挑戦もできる、安心の無料登録システムを採用しておりますので、興味のある方は当サイトへぜひどうぞ

    ReplyDelete
  48. 彼氏にDVされて、ちょっと男性不信です。でも、恋愛して彼氏も作りたいと思ってるので、優しく接してくれる人を探してます。連絡待ってまぁす! pretty-toy-poodle@docomo.ne.jp

    ReplyDelete
  49. 家出をして不安な少女たちの書込が神待ち掲示板に増えています。一日遊んであげたり、家に招いて泊まらせてあげるだけで、彼女たちはあなたに精一杯のお礼をしてくれるはずです

    ReplyDelete
  50. 全国乱交連盟主催、スワップパーティーに参加しませんか?初めての方でも安心してお楽しみいただけるパーティーです。参加費は無料、開催地も全国に120ヶ所ありますので気軽に参加してお楽しみ下さい

    ReplyDelete
  51. SM・露出・スワッピング・レズ・女装・フェチなど…普通じゃ物足りないあなたが思う存分楽しめる世界!貴方だけのパートナーを探してみませんか?アブノーマルでしか味わえない至福の時をお過ごしください

    ReplyDelete
  52. セレブラブでは毎月10万円を最低ラインとする謝礼を得て、セレブ女性に快楽を与える仕事があります。無料登録した後はメールアプローチを待つだけでもOK、あなたも当サイトで欲求を満たしあう関係を作ってみませんか

    ReplyDelete
  53. 簡単に大金を稼ぐことができる裏バイトがあります。女性が好きな方、健康な方なら日給3万円以上の収入を得ることも可能です。興味のある方はHPをご覧ください

    ReplyDelete
  54. 一人Hを男性に見てもらうことで興奮する女性が多数いることをご存じですか?当サイト、救援部ではそんな女性たちが多数登録されています。男性会員様は彼女たちのオ○ニーを見てあげるだけで謝礼を貰えるシステムとなっております。

    ReplyDelete
  55. 冬に1人ボッチで家でご飯とかオヤスミなんて寂しすぎるょ~~っ!こんなところに書き込んだら削除されちゃいそうだけど少しでもきっかけ作らなくっちゃと思って書いてみましたっ!!気軽に会ったり出来たりする方ってこの掲示板見てませんか~!?良かったらメールくださいね★フリメだったら私気付けないんで携帯のアドレス乗せておくねっ!! love-sexy@docomo.ne.jp

    ReplyDelete
  56. 失恋は心に深い傷を残します。その傷を癒す特効薬、それは新しい出会い。あなたの心を癒す、素晴らしい出会いを当サイトで見つけて、笑顔を取り戻してください

    ReplyDelete
  57. 高額バイトのご案内です。欲求不満になっている女性を癒して差し上げるお仕事です。参加にあたり用紙、学歴等は一切問いません。高収入を稼ぎたい、女性に興味のある方はぜひどうぞ

    ReplyDelete
  58. スタービーチの突然の閉鎖、優良な友達探しサイトが無くなってしまいましたが、新生・スタービーチがここに復活しました!、進化を遂げた新生スタービーチをやってみませんか?理想の交際探しの手助け、合コンパーティー等も随時開催しています。楽しかった頃のスタビを体験しよう

    ReplyDelete
  59. 「家出してるんで、泊まるところないですか?」家出救済神待ちサイトには毎日このような女の子からの書き込みがされています。彼女たちはホテルや家に泊まらせてあげたり、遊んであげるだけであなたに精一杯のお礼をしてくれるはずです

    ReplyDelete
  60. 普通のプレイじゃ絶対味わえない快感、それは野外露出プレイ。最初は嫌がっていた女も次第にハマっていって、その内それが快感に変わってきます。野外露出プレイで興奮度アップ間違い無し

    ReplyDelete
  61. 早い時期に結婚してしまって、少し後悔しているんです。私は、今の夫しか経験が無くって、このままでいいのかなって…。思うようになってきてしまって…冒険はしたいんですけど、やっぱりばれたりしたら怖いので…割り切りで会える方って居ませんでしょうか?連絡お待ちしてますね♪最初に年齢を教えてくれるとうれしいです。pop-music-lo-ve@docomo.ne.jp

    ReplyDelete