Wednesday, 19 January 2011

Monaco Want Ilunga!

Well L'Equipe say so, ce doit être vrai. Crazy things happen in the January transfer window remember. Clubs lose all control of their senses. Remember the mighty Real Madrid PAID US to take Faubert on loan two years back and, last January, we signed Mido and McCarthy in a bid to be renamed Fat Club.

But even allowing for January madness, why would any club consider Ilunga? How many games has he played over the last two years? As malingerers go, he is up there with Dyer! And when he has played, he has looked slow and disinterested.

Bloody hell, why would anybody want to sign a left back who has barely kicked a ball this season and who, when he has played, has looked off the pace and, at very best, rank ordinary? Would ANY club be THAT stupid?

O hang on, we've signed Bridge haven't we!
at

7 comments:

  1. Anonymous20 January 2011 at 02:57

    Hopefully he can be sold as the owners seemingly have settled for relegation by not making any extra funds available for transfers.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous20 January 2011 at 08:58

    I am glad that Grant stays, as like HF I think the guy should be given a chance. I personally think by the end of the season that both I and HF will be proved right and the grantazola index will show Grant to be the superior manager. COYS.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous20 January 2011 at 09:28

    Hey hf you on your period? you haven't posted any sexy slags recently.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Stani Army20 January 2011 at 12:40

    Wolves get Hammil and Bolton get Wheater, whilst these morons sit on their ass.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous20 January 2011 at 17:12

    Hamill & Wheater way too expensive for the cheapskate semi-owners - their man Silkman already spent the budget last summer on Reid & Barrera [£8m the pair] - wonder what Silkman's cut was on those deals ?

    I doubt Grant picked them - apparently he doesn't do a thing except the team sheet, toss the odd scarf, mumble the odd platitude. The one player he supposedly did pick, the not-very-good Sidwell - was nixed by Brady, in between her 'journalist' activities, TV show with Lord Sugar, etc. Still, he's not getting sacked yet is he ? £4m payoff awaits if he is sacked - anice little earner, paid for by the 'punters'....let him stay for now seems the porn men's choice.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous20 January 2011 at 22:20

    The "not very good Sidwell" would have been a million times better than any of the midfielders that played against Arsenal the other day.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous21 January 2011 at 10:33

    I doubt that Sidwell would have been 'a million times better' - maybe 5 or 10 times better, perhaps. But as Brady nixed it, it's academic. Resign yourself to El Hadji 'Gobber' Diouf, and any other clapped out mediocrity that Silkman & pals recommend to the 'owners'.

    ReplyDelete