Any thoughts of relegation will soon be banished with the news that former England star Kieron Dyer is well on the treadmill to recovery. Although it will be mid December at the earliest before Rs fans can hope to see Dyer in game action, the news that he is making a quicker recovery than expected is causing a tingling down in the Bush.
Of course, 5 to 6 weeks is a long time in the footballing career of Kieron Dyer when 7 minutes is his average time spent on the pitch in any single game. But this time may be different. This time Dyer may be making a full recovery. This time he could be back to stay.
Hang on, all flights into Heathrow have suddenly been suspended as a squadron of pigs flies over Loftus Road and circles around the western perimeter of London! Who is that heading up the QPR medical team? Doctor Conrad Murray?
He will be sent of again when the wind gets rough and breaks his bones.
ReplyDeleteYawn, talk west ham or don't talk
ReplyDeletejealous championship saddo , jog on
ReplyDeletejealous of our PREMIERSHIP status , I suspect ? , Championship Saddo
ReplyDeleteA mate of mine told me to come to this blog, he's a hammer fan.... and he is right, the author is demented.
ReplyDeleteanther negative comment from the West Ham fan,Looks like your more interested in QPR than any other team,Its a shame your life revolves around a team you don't even support.IS LIFE BEING A WHU FAN SO BORING YOU HAVE TO TALK ABOUT A TEAM THATS IN A LEAGUE ABOVE YOU??????
ReplyDeleteYou should change the name to "West Ham RANGERS" with all your pathetic comments about QPR, what a loser you are.
ReplyDeleteGood stuff mate. Love your sense of humour. Thats why gamesgonecrazy is the first west ham blog I visit for a good laugh with articles like this one and of course real hard hitting ones not for the weak hearted on west ham utd. You are positive when it is justified and acknowledge when credit is due. When it is not, well you never hold back.
ReplyDeleteCheers 1625
ReplyDelete1625 says it all, HF. The stream of nondescripts all of whom (same ISP address, perchance?) post without ascribing an identity all demonstrate the importance of your blog. Those of us that visit daily do so precisely because you offer something different. You antagonise, and tweak the nose of controversy but you will not be ignored. Why stop winding up the Gers when you can incite such a reaction? Love it!
ReplyDeleteAnd thanks to you too HM.
ReplyDeleteI too love the controversy and comments so I'm with 16.25 and HM.
ReplyDeleteHow long though must we read "Wanderers" after our name, I know its for the Sam connection but it just isn't right somehow.
Come on HF lets be "United"
19:32 oh god a love in - how sickening - you know something HM - HF could change the settings so that everyone has to log in with a user name and password but he chooses not to.
ReplyDeleteThe anons remain anonymous because it takes less time and they don't really want to spend longer here than they really have to.
The reason HF allows the anons is because be knows two things.
Firstly he'll receive an awful lot less posters (which is bad for the hit counter) and secondly having everyone with their own user names will prove that there's an awful lot more detractors posting from different IP addresses.
ISP oh great learned one stands for Internet Service Provider, which would include BT, O2 and sky. (please tell me that you don't actually interface with anyone that actually needs to learn anything).
IP stands for Internet Protocol which is something completely different
Man up!
More to your liking Nick?
ReplyDeleteNondescript at 2150 - that clears that one up then, eh. Thanks for setting me straight and scoring a few points into the bargain. God, I feel so humbled I might even consider not posting again. Or maybe I should join the ranks of the nondescripts and assume no identity, then no one could ever have a pop at me again.
ReplyDeleteHmmn. Come to think of it, nah - I'll just carry on regardless.
Jog on, there's a good nonentity.
I really thought QPR fans had a sense of humour perhaps all that time in the lower leagues dampens your laughter sometime perhaps at the end of this season when you're a championshipside again the humour will return
ReplyDelete22:21 nice one!
ReplyDelete21:50 you gave a proper bitch slap down, reckons he's a pompous twit, teehehehe
I'm also going with the pro crowd on this one. I love this site, HF is never one to hold back and long may it continue!
ReplyDeleteI lick this blogg to its grate and so is the righter
ReplyDeleteHF I've noticed something about HM. He uses a - as punctuation as does 21.50 you don't suppose they're one and same?
ReplyDelete23:42 Jog on? hahaha what's that? did you hear that at the cinema whilst watching Green Street? You're a wag HM trying to make us think you're a bit of a hard man.
ReplyDeleteI'm a surprised that you don't know your ISP's from your IP's it's not like it's anything complicated like π or something. I take it your a Headmaster of a primary school?
Tell you what 0045, I bet the children in his primary school know the difference between you're and your - unlike you!
ReplyDeleteIt's a typo HF - be fair he managed to get it right on four previous occasions in the same post.
ReplyDeleteReally HF you shouldn't start sticking up for people because then they'll know they're getting to you an your mates.
I mean when you have a public servants using the parlance of the common football hooligan then something is very wrong.
HF the quality of punctuation, grammar and spelling on this blog is pretty dire, with 2159 being a great example. Why do you think you manage to attract these type of people? because when you go elsewhere within the West Ham on-line world the quality is obviously much higher. You really do seem to appeal to the lowest common denominator.
ReplyDelete1045 I'm not sure. You would be in the perfect position to answer that question given you have used a lower case b following a question mark. Perhaps they all went to school with you!
ReplyDeleteBy the way, there are quite a few typos in your post at 1032 when you pretend to be somebody different whilst trying to justify your (correctly spelt) earlier error. You're (correctly spelt) not fooling anybody!
so what you trying to say 21:59 isn't a moron - I suspect he was schooled by your very own HM.
ReplyDeleteWhat are you talking about being negative about QPR?!.We have every right to be negative about QPR !.Funny that loud mouthed yob Warnock never bleated on about 'cheats',ran around parliament with his mate Kevin McCabe demanding a points deduction because "that's what we play for" this time round!.When your club was found guilty of cheating by breaching the third party influence rules on no fewer than EIGHT different charges.Surely that mealy mouth suitor of selective morale justice should readily agree that QPR should of had a 15 points deduction ?.Strange he never said a word when the FA had a oral cuddle &gave you a token slap on the wrist &fined you a pathetic £850 000 .The high priest of morale justice remained silent !.Don't worry what goes around comes around.You know that Joey Barton has been parked at your lot till the end of the season.When you get relegated he will move across to the Boleyn Ground for a 'undisclosed' fee (£300000).We're more than a football club,we're a way of life !COYI's !
ReplyDeleteHi Fareham, good to see you in fighting fit form!
ReplyDeleteGood man Fanno !,say it like it is !
ReplyDeleteIf ignorance is bliss you must be in heaven Fareham. Just have a quick read of the official FA statement and show me the eight charges QPR were guilty of:
ReplyDelete"At an Independent Regulatory Commission today (Saturday, 7 May) two charges were found proven against Queens Park Rangers FC, who were fined £875,000.
In total seven charges were heard in relation to player Alejandro Faurlin concerning the existence of an agreement between the Club and a third party in respect of the player’s economic rights, and the failure by the Club to notify The FA of that agreement before the player was registered to play in England in July 2009.
The Club were found to have been in breach of FA Rule E3, and to have also been in breach of FA Football Agents Regulations, A1.
The Commission found that in respect of the breach of FA Rule E3 the Club be fined £800,000. In respect of the breach of FA Football Agents Regulations, A1, the Club be fined a further £75,000.
In addition the Club was warned as to its future conduct with particular regard as to regulatory compliance.
The Commission also ordered the Club to pay a contribution of 50% of the costs of the Regulatory Commission.
A further five charges against the Club and one charge against Mr Gianni Paladini were found not proven."