Tuesday, 15 November 2011

No nearer a loan deal - oh for da Costa now!

It seems Doctor Evil is working his way through his wish list, meeting with rejection and frustration every time he suggests a possible centre back to bring in on loan. And that's hardly surprising when you think about it. The window closed some time ago and any players that clubs were happy to part with were ushered through the door then. A few stragglers remained, it is true, but they have been collected with the empties some time ago, meaning that the cupboard is pretty damn bare.

Who is responsible for leaving the squad so exposed in this critical position? When we signed Faye we had centre backs coming out of our ears - but Gabbidon, Upson and da Costa all departed in a rush, taking us down to the bare bones.

da Costa was the strange one in most people's eyes. True he may have been trading a stretch in Wandsworth Prison for a year or two in a Russian gulag, but if the impending court case was not the reason for his sale, why did we let him go? At the end of the day, all he received was on a slap on the wrist for a slap around the face so if it was the threat of imprisonment, it was a gross over reaction.

da Costa would have been a giant in the Championship and would surely have been first pick over Reid and Faye. Was this, therefore, an error of judgement on Allardyce's part or a penny pinching move by Sullivan and Gold? Or was there a form of revenge involved because da Costa voiced criticism of the club following relegation?

Whatever the reason, the decision to let him go is looking pretty stupid at the moment. What happens if Tomkins or Faye, or God forbid both, join Reid in the treatment room? Or if either see a red card? We will then be up shit creek without a paddle!

10 comments:

  1. demel u twat????

    ReplyDelete
  2. That's not a nice way to talk about a right back come right midfielder who hasn't even kicked a ball for the club so far! Or are you addressing Allardyce who is trying to sign a centre back on loan for a reason that is obviously beyond you!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Beats me! I have never quite understood the logic of letting Da Costa go. Maybe he wanted to leave the country to escape going to jail. It is the only logical explanation.

    ReplyDelete
  4. £1000 fine and costs plus £250 damages mate. Instead he is spending the winter in Russia - and Napoleon and Hitler could explain why that isn't a terribly good idea!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Also Diop can play CB as well. Demel has played a lot of games at CB and Reid will be back in 5 weeks.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Best tell Sam he is wasting his time then!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Demel playing 2nite for the reserves. Playing very well and is a fantastic player. You only put up negative stories to get a reaction so well done you have one from me for the first and last time. You do not represent 99.99% of our fans with all you stupid blogs like the QPR ones.

    ReplyDelete
  8. What technical giants is Demel up against tonight? Remember Sears is a goal machine for the reserves! I don't know why you are so angry. It is Sam who is trawling for a loan signing not me. Wouldn't you like to have da Costa as an option now? I bet 99.99% of West Ham fans would!

    ReplyDelete
  9. I may be missing something, but why can we not recall Jordan Spence from Bristol City?

    True they are having a bad time, but would he do better back at Upton Park?

    I know he has been used only at right back, but he has played centre back for the reserves and at youth level, and I think Big Sam could bring him on as a player.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Not sure there is a recall clause Dave. Anyway, he has looked ropey for Bristol City so far this season.

    ReplyDelete