Sunday, 22 July 2012

Watford's Duxbury Pulls Out West Ham Script

Change the record somebody! Whisper in the guy's ear and tell him that he needs a new speech writer. You can't trot out the same script, word for word, without somebody picking up on the fact that you've said it all before!

Here's what Scotty, the Grand Puppet Master, said back in January 2009:

"We have no intention of selling our best players, nor are we telling the manager to do so. It may be that some players are allowed to leave but no one will be going unless the manager thinks it is in the best interests of his team and it is right for the club.

"We must not be afraid of interest in or bids for our leading players. Each approach will be considered in terms of fee, fitness, form and where the manager thinks the player is in his career. Similarly, we have to consider the will of the player and whether he is committed to what we are trying to achieve. This is the only way to operate."

It may be that we have an offer that makes perfect sporting sense. But even then it will only be accepted if we have a replacement lined up who will improve the squad. A bid may be evaluated by the manager as allowing him to significantly improve his team. If he believes that the player in question cannot be replaced, he will not be sold. Players don't have to be sold but it has been clear since the arrival of Gianfranco that he is keen to have a smaller first-team squad based on quality over quantity."

Now what is Scotty claiming in Watford in July 2012?

"We don’t have to sell players but our philosophy, which is the philosophy at Udinese and it is my personal philosophy, is that we should never be scared of selling players when they are at the top of their value, as long as that money is going back into the playing squad."


“Some of the most successful clubs in the world are selling clubs – Manchester United sold Jaap Stam. The question should be not who are you selling but who are you bringing in. “Our philosophy will be not to just hold on to players because we don’t have to sell, which we don’t financially because we are fine, but if the player is at top value and we have identified through our scouting network a better and younger player, then of course we will sell."

 “But the key is that the money won’t be to fund operating losses, it will be to reinvest into the playing squad and make it better. But there is no pressure to sell to fund trading losses. The whole ambition and philosophy of the club has now changed.”

Ok the smaller squad line is missing but that's because the squad is paper thin already! In 2009, Duxbury was speaking after the sale of Bellamy, and at Watford, Mariappa has been offloaded. But not for finanacial reasons you will understand!

Consigliere Duxbury has appointed his nodding dog GianFredo Zola so there will be no complaints from the man in the manager's chair. Watford fans should check out the history of West Ham and worry!

9 comments:

  1. Not a lot going on down at Upton Park is there? How sad that you have to ramble on about our mid-table championship team of which you know absolutely zilch. Oh and by the way, Mariappa was going before all of this takeover business anyway so there's one of your farcical points dealt with.

    ReplyDelete
  2. We all know the history you're obsessed with...yawn.

    Mariappa was meant to be going in January and was always going anyway, we really don't have any other crown jewels minus Murray who has just signed a new contract to sell, and the ownership structure is nothing like the ponzi scheme you had with the Icelanders.

    Stick to West Ham which I am thinking you might know a little more about; I get the feeling you'll have enough to keep you occupied next season.

    ReplyDelete
  3. So his philosophy hasn't changed, so his words are going to be the same. Do ome creative journalism instead of page filling drivel and people might give you some credit.

    ReplyDelete
  4. If his philosophy hasn't changed, you are in BIG trouble. You are supposed to LEARN from your mistakes! Look what Duxbury, Nani and Zola did to West Ham. The blinkered blindness of football fans staggers me sometimes. It's a bloody good job your ground is Vicarage Road, you are going to need divine intervention if those three clowns are repeating the West Ham formula!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Maybe you should change the record - all you seem to write about is other teams... concentrate on your own team or is there simply nothing to write about - such a crap blog, honestly!

    Why you feel the need to write this I've no idea but I am guessing your about 12 years old. If not, I think you should move on from trying to be a legitimate and creditable blogger.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Oh dear same drivel just to get hits on your blog. Sad but I like Duxbury more than I like you.
    The side we're putting together's starting to look real tasty and Oh! look we haven't spent a penny.
    And Mapps ... good luck to him, shame he chose to leave us for Reading but we understand and he has our blessing.

    By the way, someone tell your gaffer that hoofing doesn't work in the premiership anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  7. We already were in big trouble and have been for several years and our new owners are of a completely different sort to the ones you had; yet these facts pass you by in your vendetta however many times they are pointed out.

    Stop patronising a fotoball club you know nothing about.

    ReplyDelete
  8. what an absolute ball bag.!

    Is it not ''Blindingly obvious'' that the OWNERS of wet spam were not the best owners you could wish for at the time.

    ReplyDelete
  9. im still awaiting the investigation into us due to third party ownership complications? oh wait......................that was all bull too.

    i highly recommend you do some research before you write, as you will be leaving yourself open to law suits if you write unmitigated slander.

    ReplyDelete