Tuesday, 2 October 2012

Desperate Hughes Blames Twattenbung For QPR Defeat


Oh dear. Mark Hughes is so desperate to excuse his own ineptitude in the transfer market that he is blaming referee Twattenbung. Now I am no fan of the ultimate bastard in the black, but Hughes seems to forget that EIGHT West Ham players were on yellow cards, walking on egg shells thanks to Twattenbung's desperation to be the headline story, but all eight had the sense not to invite red. But not Diakite.
 
The tackle was unquestionably worthy of a second yellow. The goon dived in and caught the man. Given yellows were chucked around left, right and centre by the idiot in the middle, that tackle was screaming out for a red, as was Cesar's decision to give the grounded Vaz Te a shove. Instead of dispensing soft yellows like a chemist dispenses prescriptions when flu strikes, Twattenbung should have shown real balls by flashing a second red to a QPR player, leaving them without a keeper!
 
Hughes looks and sounds desperate. He was exposed by Woy after leaving Fulham, made to look a mug by Mancini at Man City and is now making even Warnock look good. What fun!

17 comments:

  1. I would add their centre back should have walked for the elbow on noble!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Did England's failure to beat Sri Lanka in the cricket therefore refute your warped assertion that all Asians are somehow the "underclass" you imply?

    Other readers should take note before posting derogatory comments as several people have been offended by the idiotic remarks made by the author of this site.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Derogatory comments about Asians? Quote them and provide the link!

    As for Sri Lanka's victory over England in the Twenty20 hit and hope cup, I couldn't give a toss. I am a cricket fan, I have no interest in a bastardized form of baseball!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Aint u the one that posted u was at ....quote! Basterdized baseball ....when u bloged ....about leeds ....spunk breath ?

      Delete
  4. 1248 not often I agree with hf but reckon you are way off the mark there. If you bothered to look closely at the comments it's Arabs and Muslims he has a problem with (which is wrong) but don't understand how you can extend that to a whole continent. May be wrong but thought Sri Lanka was Buddhist anyway.

    The cricket reference made me chuckle a bit but only because of an earlier blog.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Derrr. How can he quote an image like the one you used the other day? You were crapping on about GFH and where normal people would either not bother using an image or use an image of the relevant financial district,you choose to use an image of camels. You don't find using hackneyed stereotypical photos offensive? Your problem is a deep rooted need for attention at any cost. You don't have the wit for intelligent debate so you revert to being offensive. No class whatsoever.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I can use whatever image I choose to use, have you ever heard the saying, "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder"? Why did you make the link between camels and Arabs? My point was that the deal was like a horse designed by a committee. Your racist conditioning ensured that you interpreted it in a different way. So, as I challenged before, quote and link to a racist comment, outside of your pre-conditioned racism of course!

    ReplyDelete
  7. A quote? I don't know maybe the fact you think the Muslim world should 'sort itself out' over the issue of racism (I.e. implying muslims in the UK should just get over it or insinuating the Muslim world or in particular UAE is racist too I dunno). Suspect that may have upset a few people. You also made a few flippant comments about Allah too.

    I'm not Asian so therefore wouldn't directly be insulted by these remarks. However I'm sure you're intelligent enough to know there is a significant cultural difference here that should be respected. Without sounding dramatic you would probably get lynched for making comments like that. It's all very well winding people up over the teams they support but you shouldn't touch religion. Im not surprised you've genuinely upset a few people tbh. You should at least have the decency to apologise.

    ReplyDelete
  8. 2241 struggling aint ya? If anybody wants to take offence over flippancy regarding an imaginary figure, that is their issue. I am an atheist. I respect everybody's right to their own beliefs but I cannot respect anybody who, in your words, would "lynch" somebody for not sharing them. For 99.9% of Muslims, that would not be the case of course, but being a racist yourself and having a problem clearly with Islam, you seem to think that the small fanatical fundamentalist extremists are representative of all Muslims. Nothing could be further from the truth. You should not be so narrow minded my friend. The vast majority of Muslims would respect my right to a different opinion and might pray for me but would certainly not make me their prey! Now show more respect to Islam before you try to preach to me!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hammersfan it's 2241 here. Sorry but I'm a little confused by your attempt at reverse psychology here or diverting the accusations over to me. With all due respect as far as I am aware it's not me who has offended anyone on this site. All I'm saying is I can understand why people would take offence to your comments. Yes it may well be only a proportion of Asians, Arabs or Muslims that you despise or have a problem with. However the point is you felt the need to label them and taunt them with your images and remarks. You have also chosen to make a huge issue over it by constantly talking about it. This I'm afraid is racism.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hi 2241, good to have you back. The trouble is, you are struggling to quote the racism you allege but in replying to me, you made a hideous racist assumption, an assumption I would like to believe that I would never make. To imply that Muslims would lynch me for disagreeing with them is, I am sure you will accept, pejorative in the extreme. I have discussed Islam in Palestine with Muslims and at no point did I feel threatened even though I admitted to my atheism. You seem to believe the images you see on TV. Get out to the Muslim world and see it for yourself. The people are often wonderful; sadly their governments are too often foul.

    ReplyDelete
  11. You are up Bow Creek without a paddle. Unbelievably thick,you really are. The fact that you can use whatever image you like means it isnt racist? How many moons are there in your world nutjob?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Ha ha,hf is trying to turn it round by accusing his accusers. I wouldn't flatter you by saying you use reverse psychology. My six year old boy is better at turning issues round than you. You're a racist plain and simple hf. If you had any decency which i very much doubt,then you would apologise.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Awaiting evidence still. All join in if you like. Quote me being racist please. As for the image, is it racist for Arab countries to use camels on their marketing literature when trying to encourage visitors? How about this from a tourist site?


    "Enjoy an Arabian barbecue dinner including live belly dancing and folk performances

    Go sandboarding down the dunes and ride a camel.

    Sleep in an Arabian tent under the stars

    Enjoy personalized attention from your private guide

    Upgrade to enjoy an optional 30-minute or 60-minute quad bike drive on the sand dunes

    Racist swines!

    ReplyDelete
  14. thought this was a football blog you white bastard

    ReplyDelete
  15. How come you can bat on for hours with people about religion yet when you are proven wrong over and over about your imbecilic football comments , you ignore the responses.

    Was this all part of the training you received at 'Puppetmaster 101' Mr. Punch?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Still awaiting evidence to support the charge of racism. And I'm still pulling your strings obviously 0553.

    ReplyDelete