Tuesday, 31 March 2009
I Am Faint, My Gashes Cry For Help
A debate has begun on the number of injuries suffered in the modern Premiership against those incurred in the 70s. One argument is that nothing has changed, the other that the speed of the modern game has greatly increased the number of injuries.
I do not have the statistics to hand but logic suggests that there should be less injuries now than in the seventies. To begin, free rein is no longer given to the likes of Chopper Harris, Norman Hunter, Joe Jordan, Tommy Smith and all the other hit them first and hit them hard merchants who made a career out of intimidation. I once watched Harris take Johnny Ayris out with a boot to his chin within two minutes of kick off. The message was clear to our young winger, "Try to take the ball past me and you are a dead man". Ayris avoided the ball like the plague for the rest of the game! Some tackles back then used to make the stadium tremble, never mind the leg of the victim. We see reruns of Neill's challenge on Cattermole in the Wigan game but that was a meat and drink tackle as far as the hard men of the 70s were concerned.
Then there were the pitches. Today they play on crown bowling greens, but back then the pitches by February resembled the Somme. Now the pitch is blamed if a player's foot gives way under him and an injury is incurred, back then boots literally disappeared beneath the mud at places like the Baseball Ground. Surely the joints were at greater risk on rutted and muddy pitches than they are now?
And fitness regimes have also supposedly improved. We are now talking Sports Science not running up and down the pitch carrying a medicine ball in between fags. If these fitness gurus are worth their salt, surely they should be able to tune the players to the right level to maximise performance whilst minimising stress on the body?
So why then are modern players struck down so often with injury? Why is the 100% present man such a rarity these days? Why has logic been stood on its head?
Some point to the pace of the game but I don't buy that. So what that the game is quicker, if the training is right, the muscles and joints should cope. I don't see top tennis pros going down with so many injuries (Andy Murray apart!) and they put their bodies under much greater physical stress than footballers, with many more muscles called upon in short stressful bursts over a longer period of play. An epic tennis game can last two hours, and the very next day the player can be out on court again. If Nadal can do it, and do it all season, why can't a footballer?
Either the training isn't right, or the players are molly coddled. Brian Clough famously told Eddie Gray that if he was a racehorse he would have been shot because of his injuries. As far as Cloughie was concerned Gray was a malingerer, somebody who played up the niggles and turned a twinge into a reason not to play. Using the yardstick of Gray, Beano should be in a tin of Pedigree Chum by now and Dyer should have been wiped from the bottom of a shoe years back!
I suspect that agents, supported by the medical boffins, now over protect the players. What now constitute injuries would have been seen as niggles back then. The "pain killing" injection would have been given in the 70s and the player would be out on the pitch, earning his salary, rather than lying flat on his back in the treatment room. When he arrived at Tottenham, George Graham stripped out the home comforts from the treatment room and told Lazarus Anderton and his injured acolytes to roll up their sick beds and walk. Overnight, the number of Sick Notes reduced dramatically. Is it a coincidence that the arrival of a new manager saw our injury list reduce as players battled to impress the new guy; has familiarity brought security and resulted in players feeling the twinge that four months ago they put to the backs of their mind?
Zola thought our squad was too big but perhaps that's because Zola was thinking like a player who would do anything to get out on the pitch and play. Sadly, some now seem to have a very different agenda. But I must stop writing now, the flesh on the end of my index finger is feeling terribly tender!
So well thy words become thee!
ReplyDeleteThe modern player is much like a thoroughbred five furlong sprinter, highly tuned and susceptible to constant niggles brought on by being so finely tuned to perform at the peak of it's capacity for short periods. We often talk about whether players from the past could cope in todays game, but if you turn it around, how many modern players would survive in the era of six inches of mud at the baseball ground?
ReplyDeleteThe players of era's past were more like a point to pointer, capable of getting out there week after week playing through niggles that sideline the modern player. However, when they do get injured they tend to be bad injuries which take a long time to recover from if at all.
The financial security and "advice" of agents has made the modern footballer a rather precious creature I'm afraid. As you say, just look at what tennis players can cope with and how infrequently they are unable to perform, worth noting of course that if they withdraw from a tournament .....they don't get paid!
LOL Duncan, you are the worthiest cousin!
ReplyDeletePrecisely EMO. Play and Pay deals might see Ashton step up his recovery programme sooner!
ReplyDeleteJesus Christ Fanno are you psychic as well? I only had to think something and you bloody replied to it!!
ReplyDeleteLOL Perhaps Bill was right after all, perhaps we are one and the same!!!!
ReplyDeleteWhat sort of headline is that? It sounds like a quote from an overworked female porn star!
ReplyDeleteBrandon, contact the Home Secretary's husband, he might be able to identify the film! Would be very high brow for the Porn Industry though, since it is from Macbeth! Maybe it is from "Debbie Does Stratford Upon Avon" or "Debbie Does The Globe". Now that would make her gashes cry for help!
ReplyDeleteFrom what i've seen, Debbies a bit of a thespian.
ReplyDeleteI think modern players are too pampered and their more than comfortable living standard means that perhaps they are not as hungry to actually PLAY, like older pro's would be. Lets not forget plenty of players in the 60's and 70's are now cripples thanks to the willingness to inject them and sod the consquences. I think the modern boots have a lot to answer for too. They are so lightweight and offer about as much protection as a pair of carpet slippers! I think the pitches are sometimes worse for injuries, especially when studs catch in the turf like with Dyer's injury. I think if that tackle had occured a few years ago, Dyers studs would have moved in the mud rather than catching in the turf. P.S. Nadal is a physical wreck and has the knees of a 40 year old. He won't play for much longer.
ReplyDeleteGood points. Sampras then! Or the other one who gets to all the finals, the Swiss guy. God, I know sod all about pat ball!
ReplyDelete