Sunday, 14 March 2010

The Dust Settles - All Quiet On The West Ham Front


It is the morning after the day before, the morning after another hammering. In the end, the score was probably "par for the course" with a net negative impact of three goals on our goal difference and three points predictably thrown in the skip. Ten points needed, according to Zola, from only 9 games now - but only the Lee Vitouts expected anything from yesterday's game anyway, so we move on.

Some are happy because we went 5 rounds before Chelsea repeatedly knocked us to the canvass. Those who understand the game, however, knew that the writing was on the judges' cards at half time, that Chelsea were well ahead on points half way through the contest and that, without a lot of luck and a fundamental change in strategy, we were going to come unstuck in the second half. Superficially, we were on level terms because of a freak haymaker punch, but, apart from that, we were never in the contest. At half time, I was able to predict exactly how Chelsea would score their second goal - and Lampard should have tucked away another from the same Malouda source - so I do not understand why Zola and Clarke were unable to see it coming and make the necessary adjustments to the way we were set up at half time.

Zola said the second goal "killed us", so why didn't he offer the team some protection to prevent it happening? Malouda had his "best ever game for Chelsea yesterday". Why? Because we let him! If it was Messi tearing us apart, fair enough. But it wasn't, it was Malouda. If it had been Ronaldo ripping us apart at Old Trafford, fair enough. But it wasn't, it was Valencia. If it had been Bruce Lee giving us a pummelling last week at Upton Park, fair enough. But it wasn't, it was Chow Mein Lee.

But I dealt with all that yesterday. What I want to explore today is the muddle that yesterday's team selection suggests. Why was Ilan preferred against Chelsea (out of position) but ignored for the Bolton game? Why was Franco selected in a must win game against Bolton but didn't even merit a place on the bench yesterday? Why was Cole left out in favour of Mido? Why was Zola unable to find a place for the Man of the Match in the Bolton game, Diamanti? And why was Daprela not considered good enough for Bolton but was asked to play against the might of Chelsea?

The Zola apologists might argue that the team selection was based on current form - that Tomkins, Cole and Franco deserved to be dropped after their performances against Bolton. Fair enough, but if the selection was based on current form, where was Diamanti yesterday and why were Franco and Spector selected against Bolton after having shockers at Old Trafford? And what does Stanislas have to do to get a start?Didn't he strike the bar against Bolton? Wouldn't he have been a more logical choice to play wide right (or left) in a 4-3-3 formation than Ilan? And what has Mido done to merit selection ahead of Cole? Has he scored? Has he even looked like scoring?

Okay then, Zola was resting key players for the more important games that lay ahead. If so, why was Parker playing yesterday? He is the engine of the team and is just one booking away from suspension. He gave the referee three opportunities to pull out the yellow and, with the deliberate hand ball on the half way line, was a very lucky boy not to collect his tenth yellow card of the season. And why was Diamanti sent on when the game was well and truly lost instead of giving Collison a run?

But the biggest evidence of muddled thinking is Daprela. The kid has played two games now - against Arsenal and Chelsea of all teams - and acquitted himself well. Most would say that, after Parker, he was probably our best player yesterday. So where was he last week against Bolton? After Spector had been torn apart at Old Trafford I warned that every manager would be looking to exploit this obvious Achilles Heel, so what did Zola do, he said to Lee, "Go on lad, have a field day in a relegation six pointer"!

I am sorry but Zola has, yet again, demonstrated that he is not up to the job. Cole must be wondering about him now, and Cole was his biggest fan. But what message did Zola give to Capello yesterday by leaving Cole out in favour of "How many kebabs can I buy for a grand?" Mido? Capello knows about Terry, Upson, Green and Lampard and clearly does not fancy Parker. He was there to see Cole and Cole was left out. So Zola may just have buggered Carlton's chances of making the plane to South Africa. Brilliant! And I know it is not Zola's job to help players get into the England team but it is his job to motivate the team and to manage the egos. Carlton is a confidence player and being dropped may have a devastating effect on him. If Capello now leaves him out, who would blame Carlton for holding Zola responsible?

This is one almighty mess. Burnley are going down because they have a crap team and a crap manager. Hull are fighting to survive with a crap team but a motivational manager. Bolton are virtually safe with an ordinary team and a very good manager. Wolves may survive with a crap team and a crap manager. Given we have the strongest team of those down at the bottom, how crap must Zola be for us to be so deep in trouble in these circumstances?

In Zola we trust? Try telling that to Diamanti and Cole this morning. Try telling that to Daprela's agent who must be wondering what Zola is trying to do to his kid by picking him against Arsenal and Chelsea in his first two games. Try telling it to Spector who has been hung out to dry for three consecutive games now. Try telling it to Parker who was reduced to running with the ball every time he received it in the second half because there was nobody to pass to. Try telling it to Green who had a ringside seat as Chelsea came in waves down our right flank in the first half then saw Zola leave things exactly as they were for the second half. Try telling it to Ilan who wasn't considered good enough to play in his correct position against Bolton, but was expected to play out of position against the might of Chelsea. And try telling it to Sullivan and Gold who have put their hardcore earned money where their mouths are!

The dust has settled on yesterday's performance. And I can hear, "Ashes to ashes, dust to dust" whilst Zola claims we were unlucky. The ghost of Christmas Yet To Come is pointing to a Premiership gravestone and on it are etched the words, "In Zola we trust"!

37 comments:

Deane said...

agree with nearly all of that but am still convinced Gold and Sullivan are just in it to further line their pockets and are as bad as Terry Brown
Zola should go but to be replaced by who? It's the replacement I fear I thought Pardew should go too but was expecting a quality replacement and we end up with Turds. We should take stock and a few steps back reinstate Pardew he sang from TB's hymn sheet and could probably do the same for Gollivan and it's probably the best we (as fans) will ever get

Hammersfan said...

Yep, I'm a Pardew fan.

Anonymous said...

Couldn't agree more with most of that, and I for once (I usually hate the negativity here) purposefully came here to see if you like myself are rather pissed off with that showing.

I expected a loss, but I had some ambition. But Spector... Diamnati... Cole.... very pissed off with those decisions. Either simply inept management, favouritism to a former club or a great lack of ambition.

{articularly my strongest feelings are against leaving our freekick specialist out against a relatively unproven keeper. What the jesus titty f-in christ was the little I-tie thinking!?

That one game will be forever remembered by me now as the point in which I turned and said "I want Zola out." It is going to take some convincing for me now to change my mind again, and I'm not looking forward to the grilling my brother gives me after his team, Arsenal, gives us...

Mark Hughes is my bet, that fella could perhaps do a job? Always likes his aura (!?)of professionalism but never known much about him really, any ideas HF?


~Neil

Hammersfan said...

Neil, believe me, I'd prefer not to be negative. This blog wasn't running during the Pardew era, had it been, it would have had a completely different tone. I think you have just reached the point with Zola that I reached with pardew after the four goal Bolton thumping. I had been a staunch defender of Pards but could not justify the selection, nor the performance. I'm surprised the Bolton game last week wasn't your litmus paper for Zola. The inclusion of Franco and Spector in that game were utterly perverse after the game at Old Trafford, and the disjointed nature of the display said everything about Zola's incompetence. I expected to lose yesterday, and lose heavily; what I can't get my head around is the team selected yesterday after the team he selected against Bolton. As I say in the article, it screams muddled thinking.

Nice guy, crap manager.

His replacement? I really do expect Turds to return and if he does, I will despair. This is a guy who walked out on us as a player when we were relegated, who turned us down twice when offered the job, and who turned us into Charlton Pathetic when in charge - despite having the transfer budget of Tottenham. Yep I would gladly have Hughes but Pardew is my preferred choice. His "project" was derailed by the signing of Tevez and Mascherano and the injury to Ashton. Give him a second go I say. Who knows what talent he has spotted in the lower divisions?

Anonymous said...

I thought Benni Mcarthy was useless yesterday as well. He made no impact at all

PleaseSirCanIbeAbuttPlugToo? said...

Verbose and needlessly protracted blog as usual which has very little to say again as customarily boringly usual too. Talkative could be a polite elucidation whilst verbal diarrhoea could be another and probably more accurate one. Whichever one you chose the conclusion is the same, an opinionated ar5ehol3 who ‘likes the sound of his own voice’ but lacks any valuable content apart from stating the absolute boringly obvious codswallop. The contents section is most definitely the highlight of all Trevor’s crapola

Anonymous said...

poo is great

Anonymous said...

poo is great

Anonymous said...

poo is great

Anonymous said...

poo is great

Anonymous said...

poo is great

Anonymous said...

poo is great

Anonymous said...

poo is great

Anonymous said...

poo is great

Anonymous said...

poo is great

Anonymous said...

poo is great

Anonymous said...

poo is great

Anonymous said...

poo is great

Anonymous said...

poo is great

Anonymous said...

poo is great

Anonymous said...

poo is great

Anonymous said...

poo is great

Anonymous said...

poo is great

Anonymous said...

poo is great

Anonymous said...

poo is great

Anonymous said...

poo is great

Anonymous said...

poo is great

Anonymous said...

poo is great

Anonymous said...

poo is great

Anonymous said...

poo is great

Anonymous said...

poo is great

Hammersfan said...

Oh dear, the moron returns! I've left these posts up to show the crass stupidity of the guy. I will delete later. The revolting racism that he posted has been removed. How stupid is he? You decide!

Kareem said...

I cannot believe that after all this time, Zola had the nerve to actually use 4-4-3...is that formation like cocaine or something? If he was gonna start with Daprela and Spector, he NEEDED to have placed Diamanti on the left and Behrami on the right...was Faubert injured? I can't believe Illan missed that sitter, but I'm sure he would have done a better job starting with Cole, let alone starting and playing as a striker and not a winger. Gabbidon starting against Chelsea after not playing for ages? I'd have rather put Kovac in there and put Collison in the middle with Parker!!!

I can only be positive about a few things...

1.Dyer isn't injured.
2.Benni McCarthy is back
3.Apart from Faubert and Illunga being injured, and an out of form defense, we have a good squad.

Bad news:

OUR MANAGER IS A COMPLETE MORON.

If he played 4-4-1-1 or 4-4-2, we could have actually gotten a point! Chelsea didn't win because they played well; they won because we played like crap!

I just wish I can have the chance to manage West Ham just for ONE game. We have a decent squad, and it's not that difficult to see what exactly has been getting us points.

Savvakis said...

Another great analysis by HF. Totally agree. This situation cries out for some action from our new owners. I am not sure it is coming however. This is why I still have my reservations about their true intentions.

Anonymous said...

I can only conclude from everywhere I've read that Zola has done himself a lot of harm with that showing.

Total nonsense selections.


~Neil

Anonymous said...

The only reason Zola is still at West Ham is it was part of the takeover that he wont be sacked. I think that once this season is over no matter what divison we are in Zola will go, I wish he would now. I've spent many many years seeing us go up and down, this season is the worse we have ever been in 35 years. We have a clueless manager with a clueless assistant. Bring back Turds at least we were a bit better than we are now,
Ps who is poo

Anonymous said...

arsenal 0 west ham 1 ive got a funny feeling.