First Fernandes said he would remain chairman even if the club went down, and now Beard has come out and said the project will not be derailed by relegation. He does, of course, insist that the priority is staying up, but the R word was nevertheless used again. Why?
Of course the Rs will be reassured by all the positive stuff about the future, but it really can't be doing morale in the camp much good to have both the chairman and the chief executive talking about the possibility of relegation. Why not simply talk up the plans for the future without adding, even if we do go down?
It really does seem to be squeaky bum time at QPR, and when you're deep in the Bush, that's the last thing you need!
10 comments:
That's where you're wrong.This is re-affirming the owners commitment to the club which can only bring stability. If anything, it will take the fans pressure off the players and allow them to play their natural game.
If it were the other way round you'd be questioning a lack of realism.
Anony-mouse says
Absolutely 22.57. HF always has an angle, is always able to find something negative in anything. We're top of the league and he has used Brum's win tonight to have another sly pop at Allardyce.
Peace to QPR. I don't know any West Ham who has a problem with QPR apart from HF- and as I've said before I'm pretty sure he isn't a West Ham fan anyway.
Why was the 'R' word used? Because he was asked if they would stay with the club if they were relegated by a QPR podcast. Should he ignore the question? Pretend no threat of relegation? Of course not and if he did You'd be banging on about how much the owners have Ideas above their station. Ergo the quotes. 2+2 = 4. Fool.
We have plans for any event,our esteemed powerbrokers wont jump ship and we have a decent squad with many international players and a good manager.Morale is high amongst players and fans.These are good times HF.
Yes qpr have a decent squad but I don't think its full of internationals and the ones that are are players like buzsaky and taarabt play for teams like hungary and morroco so not much of an international team for either of them really who else Taiwo nigerian international so once again not much there and when was the last time cisse played for france. I think you overrate your squad abit mate
Tbe question was put him what would happen if relegated, he answered appropriately....simples!
Fred, on the squad front, it is a decent squad and there are internationals. It does not matter if the country is mediocre. The experiences gained at international level are massive,poor to say otherwise just because u dont rate the country. And it was said a decent squad, not of high quality or the likes. Many clubs would like our front two of zamora and cisse. Diakite is another who is highly rated. Ali Faurlin was on course for an international chance before he got injured. Maradona himself rates him.
Think its not a bad thing to let fans be aware that there is a plan for the future even with relevation. Look at what newcastle have done after recent relegation/promotion. And like them i do not expect the squad to be ripped apart if relegated. Now, onto blackburn saturday, zamora and adel up front will do a number on team missing combatative givet and absent samba not to mention hoillets head being turned!
C'mon u Rs, its still on our hands.
Irish R Galway
I think Zamora's had an England cap or two..
Our top scorer also plays for Iceland.Be fair Fred,I didn't say top internationals but we do have many players who do or have represented their country.
Compared to some of the rubbish we have had to put up with for the last 16 years,I actually underrated our squad.I have to remain positve Fred.
We got our rangers back!
I forgot Jamie Mackie current Scotland striker.
Post a Comment