Friday, 24 August 2012

Does The Sun Shine Out Of Harry's Backside?


Third in line for the throne and he is daft enough to be photographed naked? I have no problem with what he was doing personally, but if a "member" of the Royal Family is paraded like this, why the Hell shouldn't The Sun publish the pictures? If this isn't news, I don't know what is!

Keeping things in context though, what's worse, Harry's naked frolic or Prince Charles, whilst married to Diana, telling Camilla he would like to be her tampon? Now that was a bloody disgrace!

Mind you, we should all thank God that the 'Arry concerned wasn't Redknapp. Now that would make you choke on your bran flakes!

 

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

another well thought out, in depth article x love you

Anonymous said...

Anyone who buys the Sun deserves to be arse-f*cked by Satan's fork for the rest of eternity.

DirtyLeedsFan said...

Nope. But his backside's shining out of the sun.

Anonymous said...

As a human, you are as low as I have ever known. Never known anyone with the capacity to spue vitriol so consistantly. Also, your ability to group people based on their allegiance to something as simple a football club, a political party or even a residence is astonishing and worrying. It is an object lesson in how people have commited the most vile crimes against humanity throughout history. I can only assume that you are a football thug of the worst kind from a time gone by, the Internet would be a better place without you. You sadden me thoroughly.

DirtyLeedsFan said...

@24 August 2012 18:33

Did wonder if HF is in fact Cass Pennant myself.

Anonymous said...

I normally spew my vitriol