Wednesday 22 May 2013

Is Carroll's injury a clever ploy to put off rival bids?

It's all very convenient isn't it? With Newcastle rumoured to be interested in reclaiming their former centre forward and suggestions that his performance against Reading might force up his price, Carroll has suddenly been struck down with an injury that will supposedly keep him out for four months. Who will buy him on that basis? How convenient.

But if the rumours are true, we should be very careful. Carroll is injury prone and, remembering Ashton, we really don't want to splash out big money on a striker carrying an unresolved injury. If we strike a deal with Liverpool, it should be on the basis of only paying when Carroll is fit.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

LOL rival bids....good one!! :)

pb4u said...

The truth is he will go through season after season missing games as he has now picked up his third injury in 9 months.

Anonymous said...

How desperate you must be relying on a injury prone lfc reject ,, if Carroll was a race horse he'd have a bullet in his temple by now , pretty much the same as you'll be doing next may Neville when wank spam go down

Anonymous said...

Your a prick f**k off

Anonymous said...

Charming you are and with comments like this you clearly have not been watching the football this year

YRA said...

Thought you said it was only the Leeds fans that couldn't spell you're?

Anonymous said...

Footballs been better than people credit us for, at home. Only paper reading armchair fans that base everything on BS' reputation say we have played poor football. We have less long balls than over half the prem