Saturday 11 December 2010

West Ham 1 Man City 3 - Taking Sweets From Babies!

Let's get things straight, Man City didn't play terribly well but still won at a canter. We set up with an attacking looking team, but asked them to defend. Stanislas, at best a dozy sod in his own 45, seemed to be playing as an auxiliary left back at times, and there was no shape or continuity as we tried to move the ball from back to front.

How many completed passes did we achieve all game? Certainly never more than three in a row. In fact, how many passes did we actually try to make? Stanislas, Parker, Spector, Barrera and Dyer, after he came on, all seemed to think the idea of the game was to run headlong into cul de sacs. Time and again, when a pass was available, the option to run or let fly from miles out was chosen instead. It was like watching an under 10 team who had met up for the first time on the morning of the game.

That old chestnut of a right footer on the left flank was perfectly exposed shortly before Stanislas was withdrawn. He had the ball on the corner of the Man City box with 15 yards ahead of him to attack before whipping in a cross; but instead, as always, he cut inside to a pack of Man City players and lost possession. That was it, Grant pulled him off a minute later. It is so infuriating. I keep saying to play him on the right but it never happens. But blaming the use of Stanislas would be stupid, the whole team were utterly inept when trying to move forward.

The critics of Noble might now understand what the guy offers. At least with Noble playing there is somebody looking to make forward passes, somebody giving the forwards the hope of an early ball. Without him, we have Parker turning circles or running head down into trouble, Spector doing the same without the circles, Barrera doing the same, but often without the circles or the ball, and Stanislas not even running!

Unreal City, meanwhile, were in dream land. It was so so so easy. The first goal was unstoppable but the second, well sadly Tomkins was woeful. He was done so easily by Toure, his lack of pace cruelly exposed. It was a shame because JT had played well up until that point, frustrating Balotelli just as he had frustrated Bent the week before, again forcing the early withdrawal of his opponent. But when Toure hit the throttle, Tomkins looked like a Reliant Robin up against a Porsche! The double rebound off the post and Green into the net perfectly summed up the way our season is going.

The third City goal was brilliant, with a lovely Silva pass picking out a superb Johnson run, but that just put into context how poor we are as a team going forward. Who in the present West Ham ranks could make that sort of run or that sort of pass? The forwards can try all afternoon but the delivery of the ball forward is so poor or so slow that they either never receive it, or are offside if it does get through. We need a playmaker and Parker isn't the answer. I said, before his injury, that Noble had been our best player so far this season, and the last two games have illustrated his importance perfectly.

At half time I wrote that my money was on a 3-0 defeat, and but for an unmarked Tomkins header from a corner, I would have been spot on. But that goal just added to the frustration for me. It showed that this City team can't defend and proved that, had we got at them early, as I called for, we could have run out winners in this game. But we didn't. We tried to defend. We tried to hit them on the break. We tried to ride the punches, our backs against the ropes. And three moments of class were enough to put us down and out on the canvass.

So the team selection may have been right, but the tactics were all wrong, as was the attitude of the players. This lot start a game with their heads down, it doesn't need an opposition goal to knock the stuffing out of them. And when that goal inevitably comes, it hits them like a demolition ball smashing apart a toddler; or a tram hitting a corner shop!

We are going down. The awful thing is that we are going down without even fighting!

Ratings: Green 5 (Did he make a save?); Faubert 4, Tomkins 6, Upson 6, Ben Haim 6; Barrera 4, Parker 4, Spector 4, Stanislas 4; Obinna 5, Piquionne 5 Subs: Cole 4, Dyer 4, Hines 5

8 comments:

Sav said...

No HF, the team selection was NOT right! How soon do we forget what each player can give the team? Spector was pathetic and guilty for the first goal and for giving away the ball in the counter attack that led to the second. Faubert next to Tomkins (despite the latter having a good game overall and scoring) it is a recepy for conceding goals. Faubert just can't defend and Tomkins has no acceleration in his feet at all, so it is easy for Yaya and many others to pass by him the way he did.

It is probably too late to do much about it now. The worst thing today was that the players are beginning to beleive that there is no way back for us and that even the owners are resigned to our fate.

I don't think there is any other club in the Premier League (other than Portsmouth last year who really thanks to Harry and Co. could not afford to change Grant) that would accept such a poor showing and with the danger of going down greater than ever and not do anything about it. I don't think G&S are willing to accept they made a mistake in choosing AG, so we are going down.

Hammersfan said...

So tell me Sav, who would you have played at right back? Gabbidon? Reid? Or either of those at centre back? Or Spector at right back perhaps?

Given who Grant had available, I think he picked the right team. The problem is the squad he inherited and the injuries.

Anonymous said...

A free header given away when the game is won is not a sign of a team who can't defend - goals like this are given away all the time at the end of games. There is even a name for them - consolation goals. City have the second best defensive record in the league this season. Whatever West Ham did they would have lost - attack and be murdered on the counter or defend and eventually get broken down.

Anonymous said...

bring back zola! for christsake.... before it's too late

Sav said...

I think that Zola would have not have us in a worse position than we are right now with AG. I don't think there is any excuse for giving Spector two full consecutive 90 minutes! I know that there excuses about who we have available. But there is no excuse for not being able motivate a team. We need a change of air at Upton Park. It is the only thing that can save us. Even bringing Zola back would be an improvement to what we have now!

fred149 said...

under zola we would have a bunch of worse players then this. i reckon we need to sell half our non english players and buy some more english players as they actually seem to give a f**k unless of course your cross eyed cole

Stani Army said...

Make up your mind Fred. Do English players 'give a f***' or not?

And you mean the same English players that quite clearly gave a f*** at the World Cup for their own country?

You might just be onto something there.

fred149 said...

no not english players who went to the world cup im talking about looks atteams in our league who have fighting spirit the english ones who dont make it in to squads look at wolves and newcastle the english players they have dont get corrupted by international football i see our u18s are 5 game winning streak and our reserves are doing well why not give them a chance they may be ready maybe not at least they will give a f**k about playing for the shirt as they know it is rare at that age to be given a chance