Sunday 25 October 2009

West Ham 2 Arsenal 2 Who Handed It To Who On A Plate?


Where to start? First 10 minutes we looked lively and good. Next 60 minutes Arsenal were so much in control I was planning to title the report, "Humiliation", last 20 minutes, the game turned inside out and we put a cruising Arsenal to the sword. In a sense, Arsenal let us off the hook, but, in truth we handed them their goals in the first place so it was a case of both sides saying, help yourself to a point!

First off, full marks to Zola. I have been very critical in recent weeks but credit where credit is due. Firstly he reverted to 4-4-2, secondly he dropped Faubert and thirdly, he got his substitutions right. The decision to withdraw an ineffective Noble and replace him with Diamanti was made early and gave us the chance to save the game. In the past, Zola has left it too late to make a change and then gone hell for leather from a hopeless position. This time, he rightly elected to substitute Noble and the decision to go with Diamanti was inspired. A cross between Di Canio and Zola is definitely overstating the case, but Diamanti showed here that he can play and can offer the unexpected that this side so desperately needs. Thirty minutes do not a legend make, but this boy has got ability, no question. His free kick was sublime, the penalty was perfect and his willingness to shoot on sight was refreshing. Yes his radar was off but if he plays and shoots regularly, he will get goals from midfield.

The second substitution was also spot on. Hines won the free kick that led to the goal and his pace worried the Arsenal defence. Just as I have been saying, pace up front forces an opposition defence to drop deeper. As soon as they do that, space appears in front of them which a player like Diamanti can exploit. I suspect that Zola has just stumbled on his best team by accident!

Keeping perspective is difficult in the heady euphoria of such an epic fightback. If truth be told, two thirds of the game was a no contest, but still we must remember that Arsenal did not fashion their goals, both were down to Green's frailties on crosses. Both? Yes both. The first was an embarrassing Green error which must have put another nail in his England's Number One coffin. Don't blame Tomkins, Green should have been either claiming that ball with both hands or punching it clear. I have noted him palming away crosses in recent games (he did it earlier in this game)and sooner or later, a weak parry like that is going to result in disaster. The second goal came from a header in the six yard box, and that area should belong to a keeper at a corner. Absurdly, Green was allowing an Arsenal player to block his run at EVERY corner. Just as at Blackburn last season, he was standing behind the opponent and making no attempt to get him out of the way or demand protection from the referee or his team mates. This is basic stuff. Green should have been jostling the player and demading referee protection, instead he did his "I don't like this" heavy blink but otherwise accepted it. The guy needs to find a nasty streak still.

At the back, the goals apart, I thought we coped reasonably well. Spector was stretched on a few occasions but he was up against Arseshavings and a very good Arsenal team. He coped. Upson was impressive and Tomkins did ok, albeit he was involved in the mix up for the first goal and the wrong side of Gallas for the second. I believe that Collins would have done better for both goals personally. His sale is proving costly.

That said, I think Arsenal were on cruise control once they scored the second. Who knows what would have happened had we not handed them their goals?

At half time I was expecting it to be a three or four goal defeat and until Diamanti's arrival, I couldn't see a way back into the game. Cole, again, was a giant but he had no support up front: General Franco had that one run but, otherwise, was largely anonymous; Noble was somewhere between ineffective and hopeless; Collison and Behrami were busy but offering nothing in the final third after the first fifteen minutes and Parker was preoccupied with breaking up Arsenal attacks.

Then came Diamanti's brilliant free kick and yet another Cole goal. Grumpy is still criticising Cole on the Org showing what a gormless bigot he is because, once again, Carlton ran his heart out for the cause and proved that, if we create chances, he can put them away. Winning the penalty also proved that he is maturing in his thinking. I thought our first penalty claim was stronger but Cole was cute enough to feel the kick and go down. Last season he would have stayed on his feet but now he has a far greater awareness.

We still haven't won at home but today felt like a victory. Who knows, had Parker stayed on the pitch, we might actually have won it! Will this kick start our season? Zola must have seen that 4-4-2 is the right way to play and Hines and Diamanti may just have helped him to see his ideal team selection. Sunderland away now looks like a winable game!

Player ratings: Green 4 (I know he made one excellent save but that's his job, the errors were sadly predictable): Spector 6, Upson 8, Tomkins 6, Ilunga 6; Behrami 6, Noble 3, Parker 7, Collison 6: Cole 8, Franco 5 Subs: Hines 6, Diamanti 7, Kovac not on long enough to rate.

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

nice positive blog for a change, it gives one a healthy optimism, and spreads through the fans like wildfire, that 12th man is always crucial at a home game.

Hammersfan said...

Don't you think I WANT to be positive? The report is honest, like everything else I write on this blog!

Anonymous said...

The most desperate thing about our current plight is that, leaving all bravado aside, there is not a single reason to even hope that we might achieve a victory against Arsenal this weekend. The terrible, terrible truth is that if we try to defend, we will be mullered because our defence is no match for Arsenal's attack, and if we try to take the game to them, we will be hammered because Arsenal will soak up our passing game and hit us on the break.

Whoops LOL

oh and by the way your posts are far too long I need to sit down for a break half way through

Hammersfan said...

LOL To be fair though:

1) We didn't win.
2) Arsenal played us off the park for three quarters of the game.
3) Zola reverted to 4-4-2 which is what I have been calling for.

Still, happy to eat my words to some extent!

Anonymous said...

funny but i was thinking exactly the same thing, the team that played the last half an hour was the best i have seen this season. green, spector, upson, tomkins, ilunga, parker, collison, behrami with diamanti at the point of the diamond and hines, cole upfront. franco did ok and i suspect he will start a few more this season, if only so we can play 442.

sadly parker was sent off for two harsh yellows, the second one he won the ball with his face and i can only asume the ref thought he deliberatly handballed it?

like you said we looked strong all game and to be fair we have done for a while, individual mistakes are being punished with rob green clangers costing us points every game. im beginning to think his mind is elsewhere

Anonymous said...

Arsenal did not play us off the pitch for 60 mins, unless you watched MOTD, they had a nice passing game, and the occasional threatening attack, but we had just as many and played with passion and heart. You gloat when you get things right when people disagree with you, well HA! I don't care if you admit to eating humble pie I want you to hear it from a true fan. YOU WERE WRONG!

Hammersfan said...

Arsenal did play us off the pitch for 60 minutes. Redknapp the Younger was predicting five at half time! Take off the Claret & Blue specs. Hines wasn't fouled for the freekick for our first goal. Mind you, Collison wasn't offside so we should have gone a goal ahead - but that would have angered Arsenal and that might have resulted in a tonking!

Anonymous said...

no, i don't think you WANT to be positive, you're too down on the team too often in my opinion and your constant negativity is unhelpful to the extreme.

Hammersfan said...

Who exactly is it unhelpful to? Are we back to the argument that the team are reading this blog and becoming demoralised by it? Do me a favour! So am I demoralising the fans? Does it go quiet in Upton Park because 34,000 people suddenly think, "Hang on, the team are playing brilliantly but I've just remembered what that Hammersfan geezer wrote. Oh God, I can't look, we're going to lose, that Hammersfan said so!" Or are the Board in a state of panic because of me? Or maybe all the world's billionaires are gathered together as we speak saying, "I was going to buy West Ham until I read what that Hammersfan guy was saying. Now, wouldn't touch them with a barge pole." The power of this blog eh?

Anonymous said...

Always too negative. As one poster said the difference a 12th man makes - why in gods name are you so proactive at pointing out faults (and then reveling in them) and not at discovering positives and praising them. Its fans like you im sure who boo at games ... no one ever played better because 500 fans screamed abuse at them.

Hammersfan said...

Col, funny tht 1931 terms this a "positive blog for a change". I think the match report is an honest assessment. Praise where praise is due to Diamanti, Upson, Cole and Hines. Honest assessment of the deficiencies of Noble and Green. Credit given to Zola. I am not in the business of propaganda - I leave that to Duxbury!

Anonymous said...

erm but that's my point...so you agree this was a 'positive blog for a change', so you openly admit you generally are negative and I think 99% of people on here agree. I find that its much easier as a writer to complain or moan about something than it is to praise or support something that works. Thats where your blog sits. Unfortunately it does not in any way lead to improvement, morale building or constructive progress. I guess thats why generally when NN links me through to here without my realising I just close the tab as I know its going to be a rant which to be perfectly honest I dont want to hear - theres enough bad news spread all over the place to have to hear the bleedin obvious. The only reason I post now is because of the point in question at the top of this text - in that you improved this blog somewhat by recognising positivity for a change.

Hammersfan said...

I think you and others see what you want to see. What about the Diamanti article? What about looking at how we could beat Arsenal? What about the articles on our best players ever? It hasn't been a great 12 months for the club but, where there has been reason to celebrate, I have celebrated. Where there is reason to criticise, I criticise. Is that so very terrible? Look at the latest article which was written and posted before I saw your latest comment. Is that negative?