Why exactly are Chelsea looking to loan rather than buy the guy? Because, of course, they know that with his all action style and history of injuries, he has a limited shelf life. Even super rich Chelsea don't want to commit to paying the guy £83,000 a week into his footballing dotage.
Press reports suggest that Tottenham are no longer interested. It seems that Levy may have won the argument with Redknapp, even if they bank £35million plus for Modric. Why blow £20m of that on Parker's fee and three years wages? You would have to be as stupid as...well as stupid as Sullivan & Gold to entertain a 3 year wage bill of £12million for a huff and puff merchant who has turned 30!
Anyway, I'm off to buy a lottery ticket for the Euro Millions. I only have to pay £165million for a ticket and if my number comes up, I win £2!
12 comments:
You talk so much shit!
Very constructive comment Stacy. Cheer yourself up by slipping on the stockings and doing the hoovering.
It's a pretty fair observation I think! - Max
Loaning him is ridiculous. We lose a player, and barely get the funds to replace him. We should sell him for £5m and let him leave with a pat on the back and a well done. He's been a good player for 3 years, nothing more, nothing less. I'd much rather sell and replace him with someone younger and fitter, or trust youth and free transfers and strengthen other areas.
What, my comment about Parker Max?
By the way Stacy, registering a new Google identity doesn't disguise your identity any more than that frock, wig and stockings do. Your Adam's apple and size nine shoes give you away. That and the ugly mush! By the way, it is spelt Maximilian.
actually loaning him out to bad if we are getting the rumoured 4-5 mill fee as whe nwe get him back we ca nalways get another 3-4 mill afterthat way we have got a decent fee
We are not competing at the same level of Chelsea. Just because at 31 (next year) he may not be good enough for Chelsea, doesn't mean he won't be good enough for us.
Still, I expect nothing less from HF who never misses an opportunity to put the boot in as far as Parker is concerned.
Funnily enough, next season we all hope to be competing at the same level as Chelsea - that would be the Premiership level wouldn't it? Can we compete with Chelsea financially? No. But we are willing to pay Parker more in wages than Chelsea would pay him. Please explain the logic of that!
Fred, the 4 to 5 million fee quoted incldes £3.5m to Parker in wages. We stand to get £1million to £2million. Try rreplacing Parker for that! The deal is madness and just shows the desperate corner we have painted ourselves into by giving Parker that ludicrously long and inflated contract!
yes and them wages we get off create more money to spend either way and whe nwe ge thim back we could still sell him for 3-4 millio anyway. I just want us to sell him thoguh i say settle for 7 mill from villa then leave it at that
What about the wages saved? your math is appalling
Post a Comment